"Shrinking" Cities and Stress
http://buffalo.bizjournals.com/buffalo/stories/2005/02/07/daily39.html
The seven factors included in ACBJ's study were:
Percentage of people living below the federally designated poverty level
Ratio of households with low annual incomes (below $25,000) to those with high incomes (above $100,000)
Unemployment rate
Percentage of adults (25 or older) who didn't graduate from high school
Percentage of households defined by the Census Bureau as "linguistically isolated," meaning that no one older than 13 speaks English well
Percentage of families headed by one adult, with no spouse present
Percentage of homes sitting vacant (not including vacation homes)
Hartford ranked 1st among large cities, followed by Newark, Brownsville, Miami, and Buffalo.
Experts cited in the article claim that stressed cities are there because of undealt-with, long-term problems:
""Typically, the cities at the worst end of the scale have been there for a long time," says Montiel, one of the authors of the institute's report. Four cities with the highest stress levels in ACBJ's study -- Hartford, Newark, Miami and Buffalo -- have consistently done poorly on the Rockefeller Institute's index. Each has ranked among the nation's 15 most-troubled cities ever since the institute began its rankings in 1970. Their fate, says Montiel, can serve as an object lesson for cities everywhere. "When we study urban hardship, we're giving a warning," she says. "We're saying that there are certain factors that cities need to pay attention to. If they don't, they could have serious problems in 30 or 40 years."
Based on this information, do you think San Diego might become a "stressed city"? Why or why not?
