| HOME
About
Course
- Syllabus
- Schedule/ Readings
- Assignments/ Exams
- Key Topics
- Bibliography
Professor/ TAs
- Contact Info
Class Notes
1. January 9, 11
2. January 16, 18
3. January 23, 25
4. January 30, Feb. 1
5. Midterm Exam
6. February 13, 15
7. February 20, 22
8. February 27, Mar. 1
9. March 6, 8
10. March 13, 15
Final Exam
Communication
- USP2 Blog
- Global Blogs
Links
- Regional Workbench
- Global Plan (GPEIG)
- USP Program
- USP Sen Seq
- Image gallery
-Other
|
Key Topics Page (printed friendly version, click here)
Globalization and the emergence of a world-wide system of city-regions is well underway. Historically, the ongoing drama of globalization has involved a complicated set of dynamic, increasingly international, uneven and increasingly ecologically interdependent processes.
FOUR FEATURES
(1) Globalization is dynamic. Over the past 200 years, periods of rapid growth as well as periods of decline, crisis and restructuring across micro, meso and macro scales have characterized world development.
(2) Globalization is increasingly international in that we see a deepening functional integration of the world economy, along with rising international flows of people, culture, information, social and human capital.
(3) Globalization is an uneven. The costs and benefits of development are unequally distributed.
(4) Globalization is an increasingly ecologically interdependent process as well as a socio-economic and political process. As the world's growing economy draws more and more of the earths total ecosystem into itself, concern about the sustainability of planetary economic-ecological transactions is rising.
The list above is an expanded version of what R.B.J. Walker (1988) spells out in his book: One World, Many Worlds: Struggles for a Just World Peace.
With these four features in mind, USP2 examines the following concepts and theoretical perspectives.
| 1. |
Rapid urban-demographic growth and resource-intensive industrialism have become large-scale biogeophysical forces on earth. |
notes |
| 2. |
The world’s global city-regions are increasingly interdependent economically and ecologically. |
notes |
| 3. |
Theories and concepts of development, modernization and progress change over time; currently the capital-mobility model has a major influence on urban and regional planning and development. |
notes |
| 4. |
The costs and benefits of globalization are unevenly distributed across and within the world's city-regions. |
notes |
| 5. |
Review and Midterm Exam |
midterm exam study guide |
| 6. |
The call for sustainable development reflects a more ecological approach to improving quality of life and habitat in the world's city-regions and their hinterlands. |
notes |
| 7. |
The globalization of capitalism is giving rise to a "New Regionalism." Researchers have emphasized social, political, economic and cultural apects of this global "metropolitianization." China's rapid urbanization puts the problems of urban sustainability into sharp relief. |
notes |
| 8. |
Global urbanization and uneven development combine in ways that make traditional planning and policy approaches problematic; new approaches are available. |
notes |
| 9. |
Research universities have a vital role to play in the quest for integrated regional planning and sustainable development. |
notes |
| 10. |
RWBC and Review for Final Exam |
final exam study guide |
Overview of each theme with a link to the week's readings and notes
W1. Rapid urban-demographic growth and resource-intensive industrialism have become large-scale biogeophysical forces on earth.
Human Activity is significantly altering many of the planet’s life support systems and material cycles including the atmospheric system and the carbon, nitrogen, sulpher, biologic and hydrologic cycles. There has been a five-fold increase in the scale of human economic activity in the post-WWII period. A recent study of Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, and the US documents the immense volume of natural resources required to run a developed economy; it is in the range of 45 to 85 metric tons of material per person each year (WRI, et al. 1998: 161). Much of this material flow—including mine tailings, eroded soil, logging debris, and excavated earth and rock—does not end up in final products, nor does it ever enter into public view. According to the World Bank, if present productivity and population trends continue, the economic output of Third World countries would rise by 4-5 percent a year between 1990 and 2030. By 2030, Third World economic output would be about five times what it is today. The output of countries in the First World would rise more slowly but would still triple over the same period. Total world output by 2030 would be 3.5 times what it is today. Analysts at the World Bank warn that if environmental pollution and degradation were to rise in step with such a rise in output, the environmental pollution and damage would be devastating. (click here for USP2 readings and class notes associated with this theme)
W2. The world’s global city-regions are increasingly interdependent economically and ecologically.
The world’s global city-regions are increasingly interdependent economically and ecologically.
Interdependence among the world's cities and national economies has deepened dramatically over the past thirty years. There are many reasons for this and the move towards greater interdependence is tension laden. The tension stems in part from friction between the call for free international trade on the one hand, and the practice of protectionism at national and regional levels on the other. The growth and decline of cities in today’s increasingly global economy is driven by the interplay of global and local dynamics that involve firms, labor, capital and communities. The process has been described as “creative destruction.” While much attention has focused on the economics of global integration, less attention has been devoted to understanding, or dealing with, the impacts of urban-ecological interdependencies. City’s have an “ecological footprint,” that is, a hinterland upon which the city’s survival depends. Cities of affluent societies have comparatively large ecological footprints and a staggering throughput of natural resources. Most of us are only dimly aware of the enormity of these flows and their environmental impacts. Environmental problems on a global scale demands that we devise new strategies for urban and regional development. The challenge has prompted a rethinking of how we define wealth, progress and development. The notion of "sustainable development" is one of the products of this new line of thinking. (click here for USP2 readings and class notes associated with this theme)
W3. Theories and concepts of development, modernization and progress change over time; currently the capital-mobility model has a major influence on urban and regional planning and development.
Theories and concepts of development, modernization and progress are rooted in culture and history. Their meanings change over time. In this respect, theory is important. Joined with practice, theory can be a critical and progressive force. But theory can also be used to justify the status quo or a deepening of exploitation. World system theory aims at explaining today's global economic order including the "global assembly line" and the contemporary division of labor among cities. Economic geographers try to explain such processes as industrial location, technological change and innovation. Insight into such processes is crucial. The best work in economic geography excels at integrating economics with socio-cultural and organizational theory. Regional Ecology integrates the views of political economy with an analysis of ecological systems. The capital-mobility model has dominated thinking about urban and regional economic development. Development decisions are largely based on the functional logic of market rationality. In opposition to this, some argue that more emphasis needs to be placed on territorial or ecologically-based social rationality. So, while there may be widening concern about promoting so-called “sustainable” development, there is wide disagreement on how to get there. There are contradictory views about such fundamentals as capital mobility, trade, state intervention, and metrics for measuring wealth and quality of life. (click here for USP2 readings and class notes associated with this theme)
W4. The costs and benefits of globalization are unevenly distributed across and within the world's city-regions.
While there is much talk about how globalization makes the world a smaller and more integrated place, it is a highly uneven process. Uneven development is especially evident in the human settlements of fast growing city-regions of developing countries. Mexico City is a good example. Closer to home, transborder city-regions along the U.S.-Mexico border are dramatic examples where significant wealth is juxtaposed to poverty. In the San Diego-Tijuana city-region, the city of San Diego has a population approximately the same size as the city of Tijuana. Yet, Tijuana has a municipal budget one-fourteenth of San Diego’s -- about $100 million versus approximately $1.4 billion (San Diego Dialog 2000). This has made it difficult to develop region-serving infrastructure in the San Diego-Tijuana area. (click here for USP2 readings and class notes associated with this theme)
W5: REVIEW AND MIDTERM EXAM (click here for study guide)
W6. The call for sustainable development reflects a more ecological approach to improving quality of life and habitat in the world's city-regions and their hinterlands.
The concept of sustainable development has changed the terms of debate about environment-development relations and the urban prospect. These changes are promising. "We have in the past been concerned about the impacts of economic growth upon the environment. We are now forced to concern ourselves with the impacts of ecological stress--degradation of soils, water regimes, atmosphere, and forests--upon our economic prospects" (WCED 1987:5). While the mainstream discussion about sustainability is promising, it still suffers from considerable confusion. Often there is a failure to distinguish between growth and development—but some scholars and activists are making considerable advances in conceptualizing the sustainability challenge and a new field of “sustainability science” has emerged. Across a wide range of fields, our understanding of how knowledge gets created, integrated, and shared is dramatically changing. These epistemological shifts—broadly defined here as movement towards more ecological approaches to knowledge production and management—are evident in academic domains including the social, natural, and life sciences; the humanities; computer science and engineering. It is also evident in professional domains involving business, government, and non-profit organizations. (click here for USP2 readings and class notes associated with this theme)
W7. The globalization of capitalism is giving rise to a "New Regionalism." Researchers have emphasized social, political, economic and cultural apects of this global "metropolitianization." "Sustainability Science" brings a much-needed ecosystems and natural capital perspective into view.
In the world’s new competitive landscape city-regions have gained importance as territorial actors in their own right. This has been dubbed the “new regionalism.” The UN-Habitat report (State of the World's Cities 2004/2005) speaks of this in terms of "metropolitanization." City-regions are the locus of "untraded interdependencies"--a term economic geographers use to describe region-specific assets in production (i.e., social capital in the form of networks, conventions, informal rules, and habits). In terms of manufacturing, there has been a shift from Fordism to Global Fordism. This shift has spurred export led industrialization (ELI) in developing countries. The impact of global fordism registers in rust-belt cities of the U.S. (e.g., Detroit and Flint in Michigan) and sun-belt cities (e.g., Los Angeles and San Diego). City-regions are the middle ground tying together local and global forces; they are nodal points in globe-girdling networks of consumption, production, distribution and exchange. From a conceptual and practical standpoint, city-regions (as distinct from nation states) are important testing grounds for integrating the three Es of sustainable development: economic efficiency, equity, and environmental stewardship. "Sustainability Science" and "Industrial ecology" add a much-needed perspective to the discourse on new regionalism. (click here for USP2 readings and class notes associated with this theme)
W8. Global urbanization and uneven development combine in ways that make traditional planning and policy approaches problematic; new approaches are available.
City-regions are diverse, often conflicting, aggregations of cities, suburbs, and their environs that need to be organized as integrated systems composed of communicating networks of infrastructures. Yet globalization, uneven development and low-density urban sprawl have combined in ways that make traditional planning and policy approaches problematic. In the developing countries of Asia, Africa, and Latin America, an estimated 600 million urban dwellers live in "life and health threatening environments because of unsafe and insufficient water, poor quality and often overcrowded shelters, inadequate provision for sanitation, garbage and drainage, unsafe housing sites and a lack of health care" (Mitlan and Bicknel, 1992:3). In developed as well as developing countries, additional concerns include problems with the structure of livelihood opportunities, land use, habitat destruction, pollution and the loss of biodiversity. Urban planning is an interdisciplinary profession that must grapple with these conditions and contradictions. Cities in a Globalizing World , a recent HABITAT report, documents four dynamic trends in city-region governance over the past decade: (1) devolution of power and resources away from centralized governments toward local governments, (2) rising level of citizen participation in policy-making, (3) emergence of new forms of multi-level governance (collaborative arrangements joining public, private, and civil society institutions in urban problem solving), and (4) policy and decision-making structures that are more process-driven and territorially based (attuned to regional blocs and area-based interests) (Habitat 2001:59-62). (click here for USP2 readings and class notes associated with this theme)
W9. Research universities have a vital role to play in the quest for integrated regional planning and sustainable development.
To build consensus for sustainability and to translate it into public policy will require novel forms of social learning, collaboration, and political action, including new forms of coalition building and networking. While sustainable development may require long-term integrated planning, partnerships, and coordinated action, it must also rely on the use of advanced information and communications technology (ICT). ICT has an increasingly important role to play in promoting collective goals of accessibility, accountability, transparency, efficiency, and equity. Yet, as a growing number of analysts point out, electronics-based networks segregate as much as they connect, and they do so selectively (there are serious digital divides within as well as across regions and nations). The development of advanced computational infrastructure should empower new forms of participatory governance committed to peer-reviewed science, civic engagement, state-society synergy and efforts to advance principles of social democracy. At the heart of this challenge is the task of strategically reaping benefits through distributed intelligence, federation, dynamic knowledge networking and collaborative learning. Research universities can play an important role in this regard, for instance, by developing Regional Workbenches--- collaborative, web-based networks for sustainability science, regional ecology and the linkage of knowledge to action. (click here for USP2 readings and class notes associated with this theme)
W10. RWBC and REVIEW for FINAL EXAM (click here for study guide)
|